AISOLUCE

I automated my own studio
before selling it to anyone.

Motion designer in Paris, working alone. In eight weeks I built the pipeline that makes my films and the one that finds my clients. Here are the numbers, where they come from, and the three things that did not work.

17video files, including one 4K master, produced in 43 minutes on a single project
2,125outreach emails sent in 8 weeks, engine running unattended
€86,000of human hours avoided per year, at the trade's hourly cost

What was built

A three step video pipeline

Cleaned reference image, generation, resolution upscale. One frozen production document: the only thing to rewrite per product is how the object reveals itself on screen.

ProjectFilesMax resolutionSpanVersions
Wool & Oak173840×216042 min 51 s5
Anima Mundi Herbals81280×72056 min 14 s1

Durations and resolutions verified with ffprobe. The span is disk write time: it includes machine waiting and excludes the client brief, writing the shot list and the After Effects finishing pass. The five Wool & Oak versions are not decorative: the cut between v1 and v2 removes exactly one 6.08 s shot.

A sending engine that runs without me

Sourcing, address verification, personalisation, throttled sending, logging. 2,125 emails, 140 runs, 57.4 seconds of pause between two sends. That pause is a deliberate throttle, not slowness. For the 23 minutes a run lasts, I am not at the screen.

A deliverability governor that decides against me

On 26 June 2026 my DMARC authentication rate dropped to 78.1%. The program cut my daily sending cap in half, from 50 to 25, without asking me anything. It had even identified the cause as harmless. It kept the restriction anyway, because the threshold had been crossed.

It is the piece I am proudest of: a machine that protects the asset against the impatience of the person who wrote it.

What it is worth

At the measured monthly volumes, with manual durations cut by half to one ninth against public references, at €60/hour fully loaded, which is the national trade average divided by the French seven hour legal day:

TaskVolume / monthHours / month
Sourcing and verification1,432 prospects71.6
Personalised sending1,201 emails39.6
Video production1.1 film11.0
Campaign reporting0.6 report1.1
Launching the runs44 batches−3.7
Total119.6

What this number is not

These are not hours I got back. I never sent 1,200 personalised emails by hand in a month, and nobody has. This is the human cost it would take to produce the same output without a machine.

Automation did not free up time. It made a volume reachable that was not. Any page promising you "hours saved" without drawing that line is selling you a subtraction it never performed.

What did not work

24 attempts, 24 failures, 0 posts published

My Instagram publisher was meant to post a queue of ten items. Single session on 15 June: 24 minutes, 24 attempts, no success. Session cookie authentication against a platform that revokes it. I never restarted it.

The lesson holds for any agency: you do not automate against a platform that does not want to be. It was the official API, or nothing.

Volume does not produce conversion

2,125 emails sent. 2.2% reply rate on the ecommerce campaign, and 0.3% on a 298 email niche targeted sample. On the same engine, the same deliverability and the same sender, another campaign gets 11.3%.

The difference is not technical: recipients there are named, not generic. Automation made my inefficiency fast and repeatable before it made it profitable.

Three things I will not pretend to know

The hours I actually recovered: no timestamp of human activity exists anywhere, so it is unknown. The time spent building the tools: not measured, so the figure above is an annual flow, not a net return. And a 452 email gap between my tracking files and my logs, still unexplained. I used the lower figure everywhere.

What I do at your place

€2,000 on site audit, 3 days

Not to be confused with my €600 remote engagement: that one is a technical prototype on a task you have already identified. Here the work starts earlier: finding which task it should be.

One clarification on sending, if that is the subject

My 2,125 emails come from a domain created for the occasion, ramped from 10 to 60 sends a day over eight weeks. That is a floor, not a ceiling. What sets capacity is a domain's reputation history, not its age: a fifteen year old company that never sent at volume also goes through a ramp, shorter but real. And in every case, we send from your domain, under your identity. Never from mine.

Let's talk

Send me the name of one single task someone at your company redoes every week, and how long it takes. I will tell you whether it can be automated, and how. Free, whether you buy or not.

kylian@aisoluce.cc